Journal of Advances in Cardiology Research

No reflow phenomenon decelerating cardiac tamponade from a guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation: a paradoxal ‘protective’ effect

K. Konstantinou, K. Aznaouridis, C. Masoura, G. Lazaros, D. Tousoulis

Abstract


Guidewire-induced coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention is a potentially dramatic complication
that can cause acute pericardial tamponade. We report a case of a male patient who had no reflow and a missed guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation after a primary coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction at a district hospital. It seems that the poor coronary flow post-procedure decelerated the accumulation of blood in the pericardial cavity and prevented the development of full-blown tamponade immediately post-procedure. This is the first description of this paradoxal ‘protective’ effect of no reflow in a patient with this unusual combination of two adverse outcomes after a primary coronary intervention.

Keywords


coronary perforation, no reflow, cardiac tamponade

Full Text:

References


Fasseas P, Orford JL, Panetta CJ, Bell MR, Denktas AE, Lennon RJ, et al. Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: analysis of 16,298 procedures. Am Heart J. 2004;147:140–145.

Gunning MG, Williams IL, Jewitt DE, Shah AM, Wainwright RJ, Thomas MR. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention:incidence and outcome. Heart. 2002;88:495–498.

Nassar H, Hasin Y, Gotsman MS. Cardiac tamponade following coronary arterial rupture during coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1991;23:177–179.

Shemisa K, Karatasakis A, Brilakis ES. Management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation using autologous fat particles versus coil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:253–258.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.