Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

Advantages of Endoscopic Septoplasty

Tanvir Hussain, Dakheelallah Almutairi, Talal Alandejani, Mohammed Al Garni, Aisha Amin Shamsaddin | Vol 08 | Issue 06 | Pp:114-116.

Abstract


Introduction This study examines the advantages of using endoscopic septoplasty among the patients with the symptoms of deflected nasal septum. After septoplasty operation, most of the patients complains of nasal pain and obstruction.

Objective of Study To determine good effects of endoscopic septoplasty technique over routine septoplasty interim of post-operative nasal obstruction and nasal pain.

Materials and Methods The research was done among the patients admitted in King Abdul Aziz medical city, national guard hospital Jeddah between the period of January 2016 and January 2017. It involved 100 patients, where 30 of them went through the conventional septoplasty whereas 70 underwent endoscopic septoplasty. Following the surgery, all the participants were asked to record their pain levels using a visual analog scale (VAS). They were also asked about the level of satisfaction about nasal breathing.

Statistically, the results confirmed a significant reduction of pain among the patients who underwent endoscopic septoplasty of (P < 0.05) compared to those who underwent conventional septoplasty.

Conclusion It inferentially implies that endoscopic septoplasty is the best procedure for the treatment of nasal obstruction following the deviated nasal septum.


Full Text:

References


Sautter NB, Smith TL. Endoscopic septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42:253–260.

Bothra R, Mathur NN. Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:737–741.

Ketcham AS, Han JK. Complications and management of septoplasty.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43:897–904.

Kulkarni SV, Kulkarni VP, Burse K, Bharath M, Bharadwaj C, Sancheti V. Endoscopic septoplasty: a retrospective analysis of 415 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67:248–254.

Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M. Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngo Itali. 2012;32:111–114.

Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A. The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012;39:275–279.

Chung BJ, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC. Endoscopic septoplasty: revisitation of the technique, indications, and outcomes. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:307–311.

Getz AE, Hwang PH. Endoscopic septoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16:26–31.

Christophel JJ, Gross CW. Pediatric septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42:287–294.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.