About us

Lawarence press is an information solution company’s endeavour to bring information among research professionals of the health, science and technology sectors.
We publish contents with the mission to provide information which is universally accessible. We provide easily accessible and elegant online publishing solutions.
Our mission is to empower research work providing web-based digital publishing platform solutions of an international standard. .
Our company vision is to provide the highest standard in an online publishing platform.
We value innovation, originality & quality.

Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Analgesia of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Alone Versus Ropivacaine with Midazolam for Lower Abdominal and Lower Extremity Surgeries

Gaurav Gupta, Ranjeet Singh Virk, Kamal Bagdi, Anuj Malik, Amandeep Singh Randhawa

Abstract


Background Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic technique for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgeries. Many adjuvants have been tried to prolong the duration of analgesia provided by the local anaesthetics when administered intrathecally. Midazolam has been shown to prolong the duration of analgesia when used as an adjuvant, providing the added advantages of mild sedation and amnesia, while being devoid of neurotoxicity, and the adverse effects of opioids.

Aim This study was designed to evaluate the effect of 5% preservative-free midazolam when added to 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine intrathecally in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower extremity surgeries.

Methods Hundred patients ASA I or II of either gender aged between 18 and 70 years, were randomly allocated to two groups (fifty each). Group I received 3.5 ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine and 0.5 ml of 0.5% preservative free midazolam while Group II received 3.5 ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine and 0.5 ml of normal saline for spinal anaesthesia. Sensory and motor blocking properties, haemodynamics, postoperative analgesia and side effects were evaluated.

Results The total duration of analgesia observed was significantly higher in Group I as compared to Group II, and also the pain score was lower in the Group I. Time for first rescue analgesic required was also significantly delayed in Group I. Sedation level was higher in Group I and cardiovascular changes were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion The addition of preservative-free 5% midazolam to isobaric 0.75% ropivacaineprolonged the duration of analgesia without any adverse effects in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower extremity surgeries.

 

 


Keywords


Analgesia, cardiovascular, transient neurologic symptoms, Midazolam, Ropivacaine

Full Text:

References


Chattopadhyay A, Maitra S, Sen S, Bhattacharjee S, Layek A, Pal S, et al. A study to compare the analgesic efficacy of Intrathecal bupivacaine alone with intrathecal bupivacaine midazolam combination in patients undergoing elective infraumblical surgery. Anesthesiology Res Pract. 2013;2013:567134.

Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage.Recommended by the IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy.Pain. 1979;6:246.

Lavand’homme P. Perioperative pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:556–561.

Covino BG. Pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Br J Anaesth. 1986:58:701–716.

Keld DB, Hein L, Dalgaard M, Krogh L, Rodt SA. The incidence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery in the supine position. Hyperbaric lidocaine 5% versus hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:285–290.

Clarkson CW, Hondeghem LM. Mechanism for bupivacaine depression of cardiac conduction: fast block of sodium channels during the action potential with slow recovery from block during diastole. Anesthesiology. 1985;62:396–405.

Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G. Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed. 2008;79:92–105.

Wille M. Intrathecal use of ropivacaine: a review. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2004;55:251–259.

Ganapathy S, Sandhu HB, Stockall CA, Hurley D. Transient neurologic symptom (TNS) following intrathecal ropivacaine. Anaesthesiology. 2000;93:1537–1539.

Markham A, Faulds D. Ropivacaine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs.1996;52:429–449.

Nishiyama T, Gyermek L, Lee C, Kawasaki-Yatsugi S, Yamaguchi T. Analgesic interaction between intrathecal midazolam and glutamate receptor antagonists on thermal-induced pain in rats. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:531–537.

Edwards M, Serrao MJ, Gent JP, Goodchild CS. On the mechanism by which midazolam causes spinally mediated analgesia.Anesthesiology. 1990;73:273–277.

Ho KM, Ismail H. Use of intrathecal midazolam to improve perioperative analgesia: a meta-analysis. Anesthesia and Intensive care. 2008;36:365–373.

Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:534–540, table of contents.

Corning JL. Spinal anesthesia and local medication of the cord. New York Med J. 1885;42:483–485.

Marx GF. The first spinal anesthesia. Who deserves the laurels?Reg Anesth. 1994;19:429–430.

Akerman B, Hellberg IB, Trossvik C. Primary evaluation of the local anaesthetic properties of the amino amide agents ropivacaine (LEA 103). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988;32:571–578.

McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:300–307.

Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Baudrimont M, Péréon Y, Le Corre P, Pinaud M, et al. Intrathecal ropivacaine in rabbits: pharmacodynamic and neurotoxicologic study. Anaesthesiology.2002;97:429–435.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.