Abstract
Aim To evaluate the accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography in all phases of endodontic therapy and to determine the magnification error by comparing it with the radiographs obtained from the standard intraoral approach using intraoral films and sensors.
Introduction Good quality radiographs help the dentist to verify the appropriate working length, gutta-percha points adjustment and presence of voids in the root canal filling in endodontic therapy. Conventional intraoral periapical radiography is widely used in all the phases of endodontic therapy. Although this technique is advantageous, it is very difficult to be used in patients with severe gag reflex, pediatric patients, patients with restricted mouth opening, mentally retarded and dental phobia. An alternative is an extraoral periapical radiographic technique that can be utilized while performing endodontic therapy for such compromised patients.
Materials and Methods This is an in vitro, comparative study in which premolars and molars was included on a standard phantom head. The tooth specimens were divided into four groups on which radiation is exposed using the following radiographic technique,
Group A - Intraoral radiography using intraoral films; Group B - Intraoral radiography using sensors; Group C - Extraoral radiography using intraoral films; Group D - Extraoral radiography using sensors.
The accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography in all phases of endodontic therapy was determined and magnification error was compared using scale function of measuring tool.
Results No statistically significant difference between the four experimental groups was observed (P > 0.05).
Conclusion In conclusion, this technique is not meant for replacing conventional intraoral radiography, however, it can be used for replacing intraoral periapical radiography when intraoral film is difficult to place in patient’s mouth.
Keywords
References
Walton RE. Endodontic radiography. In: Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors. Endodontics: principles and practice. 4th edition. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
Whaites E. Periapical radiography. In: Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 3rd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 92.
Inoue N, Skinner DH. A simple and accurate way to measuring root canal length. J Endod. 1985;11:421–427.
Sinai I, Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Goldenberg A, Bender IB. Biologic aspects of endodontics. II. Periapical tissue reactions to pulp extirpation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23:664–679.
Kumar R, Khambete N, Priya E. Extraoral periapical radiography: an alternative approach to intraoral periapical radiography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41:161–165.
Newman ME, Friedman S. Extraoral radiographic technique: an alternative approach. J Endod. 2003;29:419–421.
Sharma MC, Arora V. Determination of working length of root canal. Med J Armed Forces India. 2010;66:231–234.
Jarad FD, Albadri S, Gamble C, Burnside G, Fox K, Ashley JR, et al. Working length determination in general dental practice: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2011;211:595–598.
Jayasinghe RD, Weerakoon BS. Quality of working length radiographs taken and used by dental students during endodontic treatment. Int J Mod Altern Med Res. 2013;1:1–4.
Nazeer MR, Khan FR, Rahman M. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography in root length determination. Eur J Dentist. 2016;10:34–39.
Saberi E, Hafezi L, Farhadmolashahi N, Mokhtari M. Modified Newman and Friedman extraoral radiographic technique. Iran Endod J. 2012;7:74–78.
Chen CH, Lin SH, Chiu HL, Lin YJ, Chen YK, Lin LM. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique. J Endod.2007;33:758–760.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.